In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… mais…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims'' fair compensation.This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Martin Redish, Books, Reference and Language, Wholesale Justice: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of the Class Action Lawsuit Books>Reference and Language Much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. This work aims to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory.<
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… mais…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) Martin H. Redish gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford Law Books, 01.05.2009, Stanford Law Books, 2009<
Thalia.de
Nr. 16768607. Custos de envio:, Lieferbar in 1 - 2 Wochen, DE. (EUR 0.00) Details...
(*) Livro esgotado significa que o livro não está disponível em qualquer uma das plataformas associadas buscamos.
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… mais…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) Martin H. Redish gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford University Press, 20.04.2009, Stanford University Press, 2009<
Thalia.de
Nr. 16768607. Custos de envio:, Lieferbar in 1 - 2 Wochen, DE. (EUR 0.00) Details...
(*) Livro esgotado significa que o livro não está disponível em qualquer uma das plataformas associadas buscamos.
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… mais…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford University Press, 20.04.2009, Stanford University Press, 2009<
Orellfuessli.ch
Nr. 16768607. Custos de envio:, Erscheint in neuer Auflage, zzgl. Versandkosten. (EUR 16.41) Details...
(*) Livro esgotado significa que o livro não está disponível em qualquer uma das plataformas associadas buscamos.
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… mais…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims'' fair compensation.This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Martin Redish, Books, Reference and Language, Wholesale Justice: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of the Class Action Lawsuit Books>Reference and Language Much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. This work aims to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory.<
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… mais…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) Martin H. Redish gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford Law Books, 01.05.2009, Stanford Law Books, 2009<
Nr. 16768607. Custos de envio:, Lieferbar in 1 - 2 Wochen, DE. (EUR 0.00)
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… mais…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) Martin H. Redish gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford University Press, 20.04.2009, Stanford University Press, 2009<
Nr. 16768607. Custos de envio:, Lieferbar in 1 - 2 Wochen, DE. (EUR 0.00)
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… mais…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford University Press, 20.04.2009, Stanford University Press, 2009<
Nr. 16768607. Custos de envio:, Erscheint in neuer Auflage, zzgl. Versandkosten. (EUR 16.41)
1Como algumas plataformas não transmitem condições de envio e estas podem depender do país de entrega, do preço de compra, do peso e tamanho do artigo, de uma possível adesão à plataforma, de uma entrega directa pela plataforma ou através de um terceiro fornecedor (Marketplace), etc., é possível que os custos de envio indicados pelo eurolivro não correspondam aos da plataforma ofertante.
Dados bibliográficos do melhor livro correspondente
Much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. This work aims to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory.
Dados detalhados do livro - Wholesale Justice: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of the Class Action Lawsuit
EAN (ISBN-13): 9780804752749 ISBN (ISBN-10): 0804752745 Livro de capa dura Ano de publicação: 2009 Editor/Editora: STANFORD UNIV PR 317 Páginas Peso: 0,544 kg Língua: eng/Englisch
Livro na base de dados desde 2012-12-18T03:01:49+00:00 (Lisbon) Página de detalhes modificada pela última vez em 2020-09-15T17:14:01+01:00 (Lisbon) Número ISBN/EAN: 9780804752749
Número ISBN - Ortografia alternativa: 0-8047-5274-5, 978-0-8047-5274-9 Ortografia alternativa e termos de pesquisa relacionados: Título do livro: the problem democracy
Outros livros adicionais, que poderiam ser muito similares com este livro: